sci.energy

From:
/thunderblogs/archives/guests08/

Big Bang Busted!
(The Black Hole, the Big Bang, and Modern Physics)

02/21/08

There has been a deliberate suppression of important scientific papers
by the community of physicists and astronomers concerning the black
hole, beginning with the original paper by Karl Schwarzschild of 1916,
evidently for vainglory, money and self-aggrandisement. I bring you
free access to those papers, and others of relevance, in the hope that
this fraud can be exposed and physics restored to a rational search
for knowledge. The black hole has no foundation in theory whatsoever.
Neither Newton's theory nor Einstein's theory predict it. In fact,
both theories preclude it, contrary to what the orthodox relativists
claim.

The so-called "Schwarzschild" solution is not due to Karl
Schwarzschild at all. The experts have either not read Schwarzschild's
1916 memoir or have otherwise ignored it. Go here to get
Schwarzschild's original paper, in English. The so-called
"Schwarzschild" solution is due to David Hilbert, itself a corruption
of a solution first derived by Johannes Droste in May 1916, whose
paper has also been buried or ignored at the convenience of the
experts. It appears that the experts have not read Hilbert either. Go
here to get a copy of Hilbert's erroneous derivation, in English.
Hilbert's mistake spawned the black hole and the community of
theoretical physicists continues to elaborate on this falsehood, with
a hostile shouting down of any and all voices challenging them.
Schwarzschild's solution has no black hole, and neither does Droste's
solution. Schwarzschild's paper is a piece of flawless mathematical
physics, but Hilbert's is a poor show. And while you're at it you
might as well go here to get a copy of Marcel Brillouin's 1923 paper,
in English, in which he gives another valid solution and also simply
and dramatically demonstrates that the black hole is nonsense.
Brillouin's paper has also been ignored.

The experts are always quick to conveniently brand anyone who
questions the black hole as a crackpot. Unfortunately for the experts
that does not alter the facts. The experts must also include
Schwarzschild himself as a crank since his paper invalidates the black
hole outright, as does Brillouin's, and Droste's. They must also label
Einstein a crackpot, because Einstein always rejected the idea of the
black hole, claiming in his research papers and other writings that it
is not physical, and that singularities in the field nullify the
theory of General Relativity.

It is also commonly held by experts, for example, Hawking and Ellis,
Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, S. Chandrasekhar, that the Michell-Laplace
dark body is a kind of black hole, or an anticipation of the black
hole, and that black holes can be members of binary systems and that
black holes can collide. These claims are patently false. Go here for
a copy of G. C. McVittie's conclusive arguments which invalidate these
ridiculous claims. So if you are a scientific man you will read
Schwarzschild's paper, and those of Droste, Hilbert, and Brillouin.
You have no legitimate excuse not to, as they are given to you herein.
This is not a question of historical priority, as the orthodox
relativist is apt to claim when confronted with reality, but one of
fundamental science.

It is also claimed by the very same "experts" that General Relativity
predicts that the Universe is expanding. This is patently false. The
mathematically rigorous proof that these "solutions" are nonsense is
given below.