sci.energy.hydrogen

wrote
>> > The proof is in the content.
>>
>> My point is made then.
>>
> Not possible to prove



I know, yet you continue to believe it.



>> > The chair and vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, respectively Thomas
>> > Kean and Lee Hamilton, assert in their book,
>>
>> Like, a book they intend to sell?
>>
> So? Books aren't free.



Objectivity is tainted......no, muddied.......no, perverted....that's
it.....objectivity is perverted when they predetermined their findings and
have a financial stake in the deal.




>> > They also confirm that they were denied
>> > access to the truth
>>
>> And they know this because...............
>>
> They had unaswered and unsatisfactory answers to their questions
> perhaps?



"perhaps?" That means you don't know the basis for their claim that they
were denied access to "the truth". How the hell do they ***know*** what the
truth is....and how did they ***know*** they were denied access to it. The
only possible way is that they decided in advance what "the truth" was and
when they weren't shown "the truth" they squalked.....or that when the facts
of reality were presented to them, it didn't match their predetermined
"truth".




>> Is that about the scope of it.
>>
> You got lost at the words of the commissioners.


You mean the book peddlers?





>> That makes you what, the straw man?

> Same thing loser.


So now you're the loser straw man.




> But you are not addressing any of the evidence in any thread.




What evidence.





--
Two Reasons Why It's So Hard To Solve A Redneck Murder:
1. All the DNA is the same.
2. There are no dental records.
--------------------------
Paul A. Thomas, CPA
Athens, Georgia