sci.energy.hydrogen

On Mar 2, 8:55 pm, Eeyore
wrote:
> knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > On Mar 2, 3:01 pm, Eeyore
> > wrote:
> > > knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > > > Bill Ward wrote:
> > > > > knews4u2chew wrote:
>
> > > > > > If it works, then you have a problem.
>
> > > > > If you mean by "works" that it appears to supply over-unity energy,
> > > > > the only problem is in finding the fraud involved. Sometimes that's an
> > > > > entertaining puzzle.
>
> > > > More unmade claims and obfuscation noted.
>
> > > The laws of physics are unfounded are they ?
>
> > > > There are no "over-unity" claims about the "Electrical Polarization
> > > > Process" which is what my cell will reproduce.
>
> > > It will be 'over unity' if it makes gas with no electrical power input.
>
> > Who said there was "no electrical input?"
>
> POWER input. Voltage alone (as you suggest the Meyer device operates on) does not
> provide any power.
>
You keep LYING.
I said, have ALWAYS, said, and will continue to say, NO APPRECIABLE
CURRENT.

> > Misdirection and obfuscation noted.
>
> YOUR obfuscation noted. The word POWER or indeed energy depending whether you
> want to measure the total energy consumed (energy) or the rate at which it's
> consumed (power) is a VITAL distinction but one I suspect you don't understand.
>
> Graham

Power = Watts = Volts x amps.
Meyer's cell works at high voltage and milli-amps.