sci.energy.hydrogen

In knews4u2chew@ wrote:
> On Mar 2, 8:55 pm, Eeyore
> wrote:
> > knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > > On Mar 2, 3:01 pm, Eeyore
> > > wrote:
> > > > knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > > > > Bill Ward wrote:
> > > > > > knews4u2chew wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > If it works, then you have a problem.
> >
> > > > > > If you mean by "works" that it appears to supply over-unity energy,
> > > > > > the only problem is in finding the fraud involved. Sometimes that's an
> > > > > > entertaining puzzle.
> >
> > > > > More unmade claims and obfuscation noted.
> >
> > > > The laws of physics are unfounded are they ?
> >
> > > > > There are no "over-unity" claims about the "Electrical Polarization
> > > > > Process" which is what my cell will reproduce.
> >
> > > > It will be 'over unity' if it makes gas with no electrical power input.
> >
> > > Who said there was "no electrical input?"
> >
> > POWER input. Voltage alone (as you suggest the Meyer device operates on) does not
> > provide any power.
> >
> You keep LYING.
> I said, have ALWAYS, said, and will continue to say, NO APPRECIABLE
> CURRENT.

Any current other than zero means power.

See Ohm's law.

> > > Misdirection and obfuscation noted.
> >
> > YOUR obfuscation noted. The word POWER or indeed energy depending whether you
> > want to measure the total energy consumed (energy) or the rate at which it's
> > consumed (power) is a VITAL distinction but one I suspect you don't understand.
> >
> > Graham

> Power = Watts = Volts x amps.
> Meyer's cell works at high voltage and milli-amps.

Oh good, you have a clue at last.

1000 Volts X 1 milliamp = 1 W.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove . to reply.