sci.energy

On Mar 2, 9:52 pm, Eeyore
wrote:
> knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > Eeyore wrote:
> > > knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > > > Eeyore wrote:
>
> > > > > The laws of physics are unfounded are they ?
>
> > > > > > There are no "over-unity" claims about the "Electrical Polarization
> > > > > > Process" which is what my cell will reproduce.
>
> > > > > It will be 'over unity' if it makes gas with no electrical power input.
>
> > > > Who said there was "no electrical input?"
>
> > > POWER input. Voltage alone (as you suggest the Meyer device operates on) does not
> > > provide any power.
>
> > You keep LYING.
>
> No, you keep missing the point.
>
> > I said, have ALWAYS, said, and will continue to say, NO APPRECIABLE
> > CURRENT.
>
> In which case there is no appreciable power / energy input and any significant
> production of gases (which do contain energy of combustion) would be a violation of the
> laws of thermodynamics.
>
> I repeat - Voltage does not do work (supply energy/power) without CURRENT. This is
> basic physics.
>
> You simply don't GET IT do you ? You simply don't understand science do you ?
>
> You are talking about an over-unity or 'perpetual motion' device where power/energy out
> is greater than power/energy in. This is fundamental NONSENSE.
>
> Graham

No.
H2O + Watts in = H2O2 out.
Matter is not created or destroyed.
There is no waste heat.