alt.energy.homepower

On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:20:19 -0000, bealiba@ wrote:

>On Sep 12, 1:19 am, wmbjkREM...@ wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:38:36 -0000, beal...@ wrote:

>There is no formula for house design that takes into account human
>impact on said design.
>
>The formula for PV systems is based entirely on human use of the
>design.

I new theories! You're nothing if not predictable. But will
your post provide sufficient fresh material to justify a site update?

> Average, 20 liters of fuel per fortnight is
>a fact.

LOL OK, I've added that quote to the other contradictory BS fuel
numbers at http://www. /~wmbjk/ .

>> Is this the same 40 years of experience that enables you to declare a
>> single rheostat 150A, 200A, 150 ohms, and ohms? Or do you have a
>> different 40 years of experience during which you were honest and
>> competent?
>
>rheostat 150 Amp 150 Ohms. I did not make this rheostat, nor did I
>rate it.

In fact, you *have* obviously rated it several different ways, each
funnier than the last. The job requires a maximum of about 25 ohms,
and you've claimed that the infamous rheostat's resistance is "too
low, further control is needed". On what planet is 150 "too low" if
you need 25, Mr. Power Consultant? Oh well, pasted in the latest
hilarious "clarification".

>That doesn't change the fact that my house does not require AC.

It seems that your bizarre reality cannot be changed by reason.

Wayne