Group: sci.energy.hydrogen
From: knews4u2chew@yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, August 26, 2007 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: Bloody Knives of Larken Rose aka "The Scammer in da Slammer"

On Aug 26, 11:12 am, cpt banjo wrote:
> On Aug 25, 10:13 pm, knews4u2c...@ wrote:
>
> > One is a non-taxpayer unless engaged in "priviledged activities,"
> > otherwise one is free to sell their labor without being taxed.
>
> Why is it that the TP's who rely on this argument are never able to
> spell "privilege"?
>
Big deal.
I don't spell check.
Excuse me.
Anything of substance to argue?

> Listen, you slack-jawed cretin, the law has never required privileged
> activities as a condition to taxation.

Liar.

>Never.

Liar.

>For example, the
> Supreme Court has on numerous occasions held that illegally-obtained
> income, such as that acqured from embezzlement, extortion, and drug
> dealing, is includable in gross income. Tell us, you pathetic
> imbecile, what's the privilege involved in illegal activities, hmmm?

Red Herring noted.