sci.energy.hydrogen

On Aug 26, 2:32 pm, knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> On Aug 26, 11:12 am, cpt banjo wrote:> On Aug 25, 10:13 pm, knews4u2c...@ wrote:
>
> > > One is a non-taxpayer unless engaged in "priviledged activities,"
> > > otherwise one is free to sell their labor without being taxed.
>
> > Why is it that the TP's who rely on this argument are never able to
> > spell "privilege"?
>
> Big deal.
> I don't spell check.
> Excuse me.
> Anything of substance to argue?
>
> > Listen, you slack-jawed cretin, the law has never required privileged
> > activities as a condition to taxation.
>
> Liar.

Really? Cite a case that holds that a privilege is a condition to
taxation.
>
> >Never.
>
> Liar.

See above.
>
> >For example, the
> > Supreme Court has on numerous occasions held that illegally-obtained
> > income, such as that acqured from embezzlement, extortion, and drug
> > dealing, is includable in gross income. Tell us, you pathetic
> > imbecile, what's the privilege involved in illegal activities, hmmm?
>
> Red Herring noted.

Inability to deal with law that contradicts your moronic argument
noted.