sci.energy.hydrogen

The Village Idiot of MORON TOWN again demonstrates why he holds the title.
wrote in message
news: @ ...
> Liar.
> Rose begins with fundamental, also known as Constitutional law.

At that is as far as he can go because he cannot demonstrate any type of
income that the Constitution exempts.

> The income tax does not need apportionment because it is a tax on
> activities that are priviledged.

Sorry idiot, the income tax does not require apportonment because it is an
indirect tax that only reuires geographic uniformity.

> The 16th amendment changed NOTHING.
> Period.

Actually it changed what every legal scholar today considers a legally
flawed decion by the Suprem court that held that a tax on income derived
solely from rents and property was a direct tax. That same Court said, in
the same opinion, that a tax on income from ALL OTHER SOURES WAS AN INDIRECT
TAX.

> I have the right to exchange my labor, or contract, without the
> government involved.

True, but when you get paid (if anyone is dumb enough to pay you) the
Government has a clear and Constituional right to tax that income.

> It is my right to to contract and have "privacy in person and papers."
> Which is the right my "servant government" is supposed to protect not
> violate. And if it doesn't protect it, THEN I MUST.
> PERIOD.

Which has nothon o do with the legal and Constitutional requirement tha you
pay tax on your income.

> The indexes all point to 861 to figure "taxable" income.
> This is because most "taxable activities" involve foreign trade, and
> the manufacture, sale, or distribution of drugs, alchohol, tobacco,
> fire arms, or gambling.
> Al PRIVILEDGED ACTIVITIES.
> PERIOD.

861 only rquires you to seperate your income into 2 piles, foreign sourced
income and US sourced income and apply specific rukles tha apply to each
category and then add the resulting amounts ogether to arrive at your taxble
income. It exempts nothing, it excludes nothing.

> If you are not getting paid by the government, a government
> contractor, or acting as a ficticious figure head of a ficticious
> entity, you are not an "employee" as the TERM is defined in your law.
> Period.
> Simple.

Only to a simpleton like you. It does not matter who employs you or what and
where you derive your income for it is taxed.

> Just like the law is required to be, understandable by those for whom
> it is to be understood, ie. the masses.
> The rest is bullshit for "regular joes" except for corporations and
> other government created ficticious entities for which it is a
> priviledge to "exist" created by the government and REGULATED.
> Period.

The law must be understandable to the average person. There is no
Constitutional rquirement that it be undetstandable to moon like you.

> I do not exist by priviledge of the government.
> I exist by the exchange of my labor for which I cannot be directly
> taxed without apportionment.
> Period.

Moron, you exist because you were born and have not yet your
presence in this country is at the forbeqarance of this Country and its
citizens.

YOU ARE THE VILLAGE IDIOT OF MORON TOWN!!!!!!