sci.energy

" " < @ > wrote in message
news: @ ...
>> Hey .. you make me (and everyone else) your enemy if that's what you want
>> ..
>> its your choice. You must be a sad and lonely little old man.
>
> ----------
> while i coined the term (or idea) of the 'Circlon'
> i knew nothing about somebody else using the same name
>
> the Circlon idea (with another name)
> is in my book since 1993 !!

A book !?! .. my god .. do you have a whole book of your nonsense?

> it is in the appendix of my book
> and the appendix of my site
> only a persoanl enemy would pick one tyhe name
> and not on the issue

Its not my fault if you used the name that someone else had already used.
That's your problem

> ios the idea of a basic particle that moves naturally
> in a closed Circle we was ever suggeted
> begfore me ???

It looks like that's what Jame Carter's circlon is. I don't know who
published the idea first.

> now the psychopath private enemy will forget about
> orriginal copyright
> and say
> 'it is a worthless.. idea !!

Yeup .. two crackpots with similar 'ideas'

> can you jsut give me the originality credit ??(even if not right
> according the great physicist Jekyle ??

Not if you don't deserve it, no.

> 2
> have you **ever ** innovated anything in physics ?
> lets hear about it !!

No .. I don't pretend to have done so, and I wouldn't publish nonsense like
the stuff you post here and claim it is innovative. Its just ignorance and
crackpottery