sci.energy

On Sep 7, 6:09 am, "Jeckyl" wrote:
> " " < ...@ > wrote in message
>
> news: @ ...
>
> >> Hey .. you make me (and everyone else) your enemy if that's what you want
> >> ..
> >> its your choice. You must be a sad and lonely little old man.
>
> > ----------
> > while i coined the term (or idea) of the 'Circlon'
> > i knew nothing about somebody else using the same name
>
> > the Circlon idea (with another name)
> > is in my book since 1993 !!
>
> A book !?! .. my god .. do you have a whole book of your nonsense?
>
> > it is in the appendix of my book
> > and the appendix of my site
> > only a persoanl enemy would pick one tyhe name
> > and not on the issue
>
> Its not my fault if you used the name that someone else had already used.
> That's your problem
>
> > ios the idea of a basic particle that moves naturally
> > in a closed Circle we was ever suggeted
> > begfore me ???
>
> It looks like that's what Jame Carter's circlon is. I don't know who
> published the idea first.
>
> > now the psychopath private enemy will forget about
> > orriginal copyright
> > and say
> > 'it is a worthless.. idea !!
>
> Yeup .. two crackpots with similar 'ideas'
>
> > can you jsut give me the originality credit ??(even if not right
> > according the great physicist Jekyle ??
>
> Not if you don't deserve it, no.
>
> > 2
> > have you **ever ** innovated anything in physics ?
> > lets hear about it !!
>
> No .. I don't pretend to have done so, and I wouldn't publish nonsense like
> the stuff you post here and claim it is innovative. Its just ignorance and
> crackpottery

-------------
psychopath
--------------------