sci.energy

On Sep 2, 7:11 pm, " " < ...@ > wrote:
> On Sep 2, 8:35 am, "Autymn D. C." wrote:
> > On Sep 1, 1:33 am, " " < ...@ > wrote:
> > > On Aug 14, 10:21 pm, "greysky" wrote:
> > > > one of Saturn's moons and set you up with a cozy environment and ma=
ny sexy
> > > > in-heat women, because form your vantage point, all you'd see is a =
very
> > > > bright flash as the Earth stopped existing as a planet housing 6 bi=
llion
> > > > humans and many billions more of various plant and animal species. =
Perhaps
> > > > you could ask your supernatural force why it would do such a silly =
thing?
> > > hey Greyskeycan you tell us
> > > how 10 percent of mass is becoming 90 pecent??
>
> > Hmm, a hadr=F2n's empeiric formula is not lik its kemic formula? Why
> > can't you get one molecule of watter in a cup, why only none or many?
>
> > Did you also know there are 8 glu=F2ns? (9 with the nouht-glu=F2n)
>
> > > can you tell os why are there only 3 quarks
> > > why 4
> > > why not 5 ??
>
> > /groups?q=3DAutymn+New-Model /groups?q.=
.=2E
>
> > > 3
> > > can you tell us by your 'not supernatural' unsedstandings
>
> > > how
> > > **3 quarks* are making a sphere ??
>
> > Who said a hadr=F2n was a sfair? I gave you news that the prot=F2n cou=
ld
> > be a ring or peanut. I also said that two quarks could trend about
> > one quark and trace out a ring of a ring, which is like a sfair.

> sorry i ddint get you!

where?

> there migh tbe evn 6 quarks
> but not in one hadron!

so?

> 2
> if you whant to be clear in geometry
> you have to be less verbal and more geometry using

So where is your proof against three quarks?

> 3
> do you know tha t there are 'physicsits'
> that claime that you can never know the geometry
> of the hadron 'becauase of the HUP' ???
> (that is their claime not mine (:-)

who? where?

> 4
> even if i will be killed
> (and burned on the stake in the market place (:-))
> i will not accept the (crooked stupid ) notion of :
>
> 10 percent of masss becoming 100 percent of
> (REST ) mass
> of the hadron ....
> and i hope you and others alread know that
>
> THERE IS ONLY ONE KIND OF MASS ----
> INVARIANT MASS !!!.

Not sorry, but I don't believe in invariants. Relativistic gamma
distributs to both mass and velocity.