alt.energy.homepower

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:02:25 GMT, wmbjkREMOVE@ wrote:

>On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 07:15:38 +0100, Eeyore
> wrote:
>
>
>>We concluded that whoever owns these turbines must actually be ** applying power
>>** to them to get them to rotate . There's no way they could be behaving as they
>>were naturally.
>
>You might expand upon what you started here, by writing a book about
>the subject of fake wind power. Much like others have done with faked
>moon landings, the Titanic conspiracy, etc.
>
>>I can only presume
>
>Rather than jumping to a silly conclusion, it seems like it would be
>smarter to "presume" that it takes very little wind to rotate an
>unloaded turbine below cut-in speed.

Certainly if you look at the (rather substantial) wind farm in the
California desert near Palm springs you will see some not rotating.

Which is not to say that it isn't a 'con' in an economic sense, but
almost everything supported by the government from military on down
could fall into that category.


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@ Info for manufacturers:
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: