sci.energy

In article < $ @ >
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
> H. E. Taylor wrote:
>> In article < $ @ >,
>> Dan Bloomquist wrote:
>>>H. E. Taylor wrote:
>>>>In article < @ >,
>>>> Sporkman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> /2007/01/31/more-on-eestors-ultracapacitor-can-we-believe-the-hype/
>>>>>
>>>>>Lots of wondermous claims, but we've all seen wondermous claims before.
>>>>>Could this be the real McCoy, or another rubber carrot like cold fusion?
>>>>
>>>> I don't know.
>>>> I notice some people are investing serious money.
>>>> The reference below gives a patent number one could check out.
>>>>
>>>> See also:
>>>> 2007/09/03: TEB: EEStor Update #8
>>>> < /energy/2007/09/ >
>>>
>>>Like, I could patent braindead. What's your point? If you can't crunch
>>>the numbers, take to alt., where the believers roam.......
>>
>> Your hostile negativity is uninformative.
>> If you know something, spill it.
>
> This is usenet, get use to it. And my post before yours, above, I told
> you where you could find the long winded version. And in a post around
> an hour ago I posted the core argument.
>

Not in this thread which is completely captured above.
Do you have a message ID for either "the long winded version"
or the "core argument"?

>> Otherwise I am willing to wait & let ZENN Motors find out.
>
> Then either they are part of the scam or have no one on staff that can
> do some simple research. The physics are pretty simple.
>

I don't know the details of the ZENN - EEStor relationship.
And I don't know what ZENN knows.
Evidently neither do you.


-het


PS.
Have EEStor mentioned a dielectric constant for their new material?



--
"If we are to embark on a Manhattan Project to get off of our petroleum
dependence, we should direct our efforts toward an eventual electric
transportation infrastructure." -Robert Rapier

Gee Whiz File: /~het/energy/ #Wunderbar
. Taylor /~het/