sci.energy

In article < $ @ >,
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
> H. E. Taylor wrote:
>> In article < @ >,
>> Eeyore [aka Graham] wrote:
>>>"H. E. Taylor" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Have EEStor mentioned a dielectric constant for their new material?
>>>
>>>A figure is mentioned in the patent IIRC. The number appears to be unrealistic.
>>
>> Well we will see eventually.
>
> Means you don't know how to crunch the numbers......
>

Oh quit flexing your muscles. Nobody is impressed.

What it means is that I don't know what EEStor may have.
This is not a case like Steorn where someone is claiming
to violate the law of conservation of energy or something
like that. And they are not following the typical fraudster
pattern of seeking investors. I am not saying they have
their ridiculously high dielectric constant material, but
there is no theoretical reason it couldn't exist, as unlikely
as that may seem to you. I am willing to wait and see.

>> Maybe they will surprise us.
>
> So will Newman's motor............
>
> Learn the physics if you plan to post, or cross post, to .sci
>

As above.


-het


--
"Confucious say mind like book. Must be open to be useful."
-Charlie Chan

Science Links: /~het/
. Taylor /~het/