sci.energy

Eeyore wrote:
>
> Dan Bloomquist wrote:
>
>
>>Eeyore wrote:
>>
>>>About 'powered roadways' ? The idea (whilst technically feasible) is fundamentally
>>>ridiculous for a zillion practical reasons..
>>
>>What kind of 'truth' are you trying to create here Graham? It is not
>>usually your style to blatantly lie. Is this some kind of desperate move?
>
>
> Are you trying to suggest that 'powered roadways' are a practical energy saving idea ?

If you are going to insist on this lie, back it up with a quote. I'll be
waiting........