sci.energy

Dan Bloomquist wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
> > Dan Bloomquist wrote:
> >>Eeyore wrote:
> >>
> >>>About 'powered roadways' ? The idea (whilst technically feasible) is fundamentally
> >>>ridiculous for a zillion practical reasons..
> >>
> >>What kind of 'truth' are you trying to create here Graham? It is not
> >>usually your style to blatantly lie. Is this some kind of desperate move?
> >
> >
> > Are you trying to suggest that 'powered roadways' are a practical energy saving idea ?
>
> If you are going to insist on this lie, back it up with a quote. I'll be
> waiting........

I presume your excessive snippage was intended to remove that evidence. I can't be bothered
to waste any time on your idiotic games.

Graham