sci.energy

Eric Gisin wrote:
> "Dan Bloomquist" wrote in message
> news: $ @ ...
>
>>
>> Eeyore wrote:
>>
>>>> And I posted such back on 7/30 in this very thread. Graham refuses to
>>>> get it so he makes it about me.
>>>
>>>
>>> About 'powered roadways' ? The idea (whilst technically feasible) is
>>> fundamentally
>>> ridiculous for a zillion practical reasons..
>>
>>
>> Now I get it. You are a dumb shit. Go back and read the reference.
>> Quit being a lazy fuck so to suit your agenda.......
>>
> No trollboy, YOU post a summary of this idiotic idea for US.

Actually, I didn't, and especially not for YOU.

> I'm not going read every URL posted by net kooks who don't understand
> science.

Ah, Eric is still miffed because I catch him being an idiot so often.
Talk about a 'scientific illiterate'.