sci.energy.hydrogen

On Aug 31, 1:15 pm, Dan Bloomquist wrote:
> Li RM wrote:
> > ...in the interests of science, of
> > course.
>
> Ok, I'm ready to listen. I did some math the first time I heard about
> this stuff. Maybe I've got the numbers wrong, but where?
>
> ***
> First is the official video /images/
>
> It is very likely this is faked. There is a good pdf out there that does
> forensics on this video. But it was 'officially' released and shows the
> aircraft at level flight by this point. There is also the lamp posts
> that say the aircraft was on a fairly level path from the clover leaf on.
>
> http:// /F77/images/
>
> Here are the altitudes from the annex to the pentagon on the flight path.
>
> http:// /F77/images/
> from: / ?t=2&s=11&x=802&y=10760&z=18&w=1
>
> Here is the geometry for the math.
>
> http:// /F77/images/
>
> Start with ADB= 2*ABC.
> ABC= tan^-1 (110/1500)=
> Bisect ADB to work with a right triangle.
> R= csc( ABC ) * AB/2, 10,000 feet.
>
> This is the radius of the arc of approach. From there you can calculate
> the force in that arc.
>
> force in Gs at feet per second = 1 + v2/rg
> 1 + 800^2 / ( 10000 * 32 )= 3 Gs
> 1 + 500^2 / ( 10000 * 32 )= Gs
> 1 + 300^2 / ( 10000 * 32 )= Gs
>
> The 'official consensus' velocity was 800 ft/s.
>
> This is what the numbers say. That if the aircraft just touched the
> ground at the annex, moving 800 ft/s, it would have to be in a 3G pullup
> from the annex to the pentagon. It also means that for an optimum
> approach, (minimum Gees), that it would have to be on a vector pointing
> at exactly half way between the annex and the pentagon when it touched
> the ground at the annex. If the aircraft, with perfect execution, were
> to clear the ground by 100 feet at the annex then the forces double.
>
> So you have a pilot that is on a course to just clear the annex and on a
> vector at the half way point suddenly pull into a 3-6G clime for
> seconds then suddenly level out. That is some impossible flying
> especially considering the other conditions. Conditions like the alleged
> experience of this pilot and that the pilot had no idea he would be
> making this maneuver before he got there.
>
> This was the very first thing I looked at. I didn't even know about
> building number 7 and the 'truth' movement. It was a challenge from
> someone else that the approach looked very difficult. I though I was
> going to show otherwise but the numbers said I couldn't. After that, I
> had to doubt the official story. And everything else I discovered after
> that made it one amazing day.

Welcome to the matrix (of lies).