>Reply to article by: owl
>Date written: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 01:28:31 -0700
>MsgID:< @ >
>> >Abstract. Recent analyses indicate that the amount of atmospheric CO2
>> >required to cause dangerous climate change is at most 450 ppm, and
>> >likely less than that.
>> Past analysis has shown that 4400 ppm during the Late Ordovician period had
>> little effect on temperature. How does "recent analysis" account for that?
>Not sure where you got the glue to join those two dots.
At least you ask...
>Do you have a cite?
CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate. 2004 Dana L. Royer, Robert A.
Berner, Isabel P. MontaƱez, Neil J. Tabor, and David J. Beerling
/GG/FACULTY/POPP/Royer%20et%20al.%202004%20GSA%
GEOCARB III: A REVISED MODEL OF ATMOSPHERIC CO2 OVER PHANEROZOIC TIME. 2001.
ROBERT A. BERNER and ZAVARETH KOTHAVALA.
/WVFossils/Reference_Docs/
>Looking for stuff, I'm coming up with the O period with Gondwaonaland
>curved around the South Pole and the northern hemisphere large-mass
>free. The refs highlight the paradox of high GHGs while the climate
>became unstable and slid in and out of ice ages. The end of the 50-
>million year period end in a cold-climate extinction period. There's
>no conlcusion there about CO2's effect being absent. What's your
>source?
See above.
The Sage
=============================================================
/ /
"It is a cold fact: the Global Cooling presents humankind
with the most important social, political, and adaptive
challenge we have had to deal with for ten thousand years.
Your stake in the decisions we make concerning it is of
ultimate importance; the survival of ourselves, our children,
our species" (Lowell Ponte, 1976)
=============================================================