sci.energy

"Bill Ward" wrote in message
news: @ ...
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 13:27:50 -0400, daestrom wrote:
>
>>
>> "Bill Ward" wrote in message
>> news: @ ...
>>> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:48:00 -0400, daestrom wrote:
>>
>
> Thanks for your post, daestrom, I appreciate your detailed comments. I
> just got back in town, and must apologize for the misguided ad hominem
> attacks on you I've seen by other posters. I'm afraid some are not used
> to reasoned discussion, and go off the deep end at the slightest critical
> comment. Sometimes this group is a bit juvenile.

It's pointless to treat these propagandist with respect. Any respect you
pay a global warming cultist will be considered confirmation of their
"theory" in their eyes.

>
> Your remarks are far more pertinent, IMHO, than any of the other responses
> I've received. I've read them over, and will respond in a day or two, as
> soon as I get caught up and can do them justice.
>
>
>
>
>