On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:53:11 -0000, bealiba@ wrote:
>On Aug 23, 1:12 am, wmbjkREM...@ wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:51:17 -0000, beal...@ wrote:
>> >Then go wild, check everybody's claims, and that includes mine.
>>
>> OK! Let's start here - you claimed that you can take a battery from
>> some low state of charge to full in 3 hours at C/28 rate. The
>> "average, normal" poster here would say that's impossible. So please
>> tell us (in plain English!) what the starting and ending SOC was. For
>> example, 30 and 40%, or 90 and 100%.
>>
>> > If
>> >there are no numbers, no problem, just ask the person for them.
>> >Anybody who is above board should be happy to divulge the information.
>>
>> And yet I'm guessing
>> simple numbers I just asked for.
So after inviting us to check your claims and ask for any missing
numbers, and declaring that "anybody who is above board should be
happy to divulge the information", you failed to provide 2 very simple
numbers. Exactly as I predicted! Just a lucky guess, eh ghinius? Since
you're obviously *not* happy to divulge the information, by your own
implication we should conclude that *you're* not "above board". Do you
suppose that not being above board might be a large part of the reason
that there are web sites ridiculing you?
http://www. /~wmbjk/
/
Wayne