alt.energy.renewable

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:11:56 GMT, Vaughn Simon wrote:

>"Mishagam" wrote in message
>news:47ae4b93$0$22832$4c368faf@...
>>> Maybe, but we don't have infinite storage for the waste.

> That is OK. We won't need anything close to infinite storage for nuclear
>waste. Storage of nuclear waste is a political problem, not a physical,
>scientific, or engineering problem. It must be treated as such or we will
>continue devistating our planet and killing our population with the waste from
>coal plants.

>> I haven't noticed any physical / engineering limits for quantity of waste that
>> can be buried in deep mines or in the mud under oceans floor. I bet you can
>> bury 1000 times more that is produced now - and nobody would notice.

> Why would you want to bury something as valuable as nuclear fuel elements?
>Recycle!

You're joking right? Maybe you can ask the federal govt. to store some
of that waste in your garage and then you can see what you can do with it.