alt.energy.renewable

AZ Nomad wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:11:56 GMT, Vaughn Simon wrote:
>
>> "Mishagam" wrote in message
>> news:47ae4b93$0$22832$4c368faf@...
>>>> Maybe, but we don't have infinite storage for the waste.
>
>> That is OK. We won't need anything close to infinite storage for nuclear
>> waste. Storage of nuclear waste is a political problem, not a physical,
>> scientific, or engineering problem. It must be treated as such or we will
>> continue devistating our planet and killing our population with the waste from
>> coal plants.
>
>>> I haven't noticed any physical / engineering limits for quantity of waste that
>>> can be buried in deep mines or in the mud under oceans floor. I bet you can
>>> bury 1000 times more that is produced now - and nobody would notice.
>
>> Why would you want to bury something as valuable as nuclear fuel elements?
>> Recycle!
>
> You're joking right? Maybe you can ask the federal govt. to store some
> of that waste in your garage and then you can see what you can do with it.
>


50 million USD bottom line price to store a ton of nuclear waste is
what I've seen.

Send me 200 pounds and a check for 5 million..........I'll work
something out