alt.energy.renewable

Morris Dovey wrote:
> Erdemal wrote:
> | Morris Dovey wrote:
> || Erdemal wrote:
> ||
> ||| What would happen if a system - finite - was really able to
> ||| produce forever energy with no internal change - constante entropy
> ||| - ?
> ||
> || With general use, the planet would be rendered uninhabitable in a
> || fairly short period.
> ||
> || We'd need a concurrent breakthrough to destroy energy.
> |
> | Yes, this was my first answer too :) universe temperature would
> | be infinite ... and I thought at big bang :) which I know very
> | little about.
> |
> | But I got a better idea lining at a read light comming back home :
> |
> | If a system can give energy to it's neighbors without any
> | internal change, it would probably too be able to accept
> | energy with no internal change :).
> |
> | So, as a great genious, I stated that each of our dream
> | systems are married with one of the other kind :)
>
> You make this too easy. The effect can only be balanced between pairs
> consisting of one "giver" and one "receiver" - and every object is one
> such pair in that it gives /to/ itself exactly what it receives /from/
> itself.
>

If a single "giver" can be created then the single "receiver" can be
created as well. In a previous message we pointed out how "hell" a
single "giver" can be, now it's time to think about what "anti hell"
could be a single "receiver".

Imagine a handyman ... perpetual motion ... garage ... bad luck ...
"receiver" ... growing iceberg ...

Thank you Morris,

Erdy