sci.energy.hydrogen

Stuart Grey wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:07:54 +0000, Richard Macdonald wrote:
>
>> wrote in message
>> news: @ ...
>>> /articles/october2007/
>> One key word people forget in the 1st Amendment is "peacable"
>> excersing your free speach in a manner to disturb and disrupt others
>> activities is not peacable.
>
> Where does it say peaceable in the 1st Amendment? It doesn't.

Please read it at least ONCE in your life, before you make such a
complete ass of yourself again...

> The first amendment covers speech and print ONLY. It doesn't say anything
> about acts, like clogging the streets with crowds, or burning flags. Those
> are neither print nor voice.

Says the guy who writes without knowing a think of which he writes.
Time after time.

> A long time ago, nine idiots, chosen for their political partisanship,
> were given impressive looking black robes and set loose on the American
> people without check or balance to dictate their whims from the bench. The
> American people, duly impress by their black robes, nod their heads and go
> along with whatever foolish and stupid, and plainly wrong, thing they
> utter. I find this sad, disappointing, and proof that people cannot govern
> themselves; that the bulk of people are too stupid to have a republic.

Well, Bush actually inhabits the White House, so something of what you
say is true.

Ensconced by 5 people in black dresses...

> The odd thing is, the founding fathers KNEW the bulk of the people were
> too stupid to have a republic. Our system of government is flawed, but I
> don't know of a better system... yet.

We've shown that we can survive Democrats. We might even survive
Republicans.

Dan