sci.energy.hydrogen

"strabo" wrote in message
news:1191451743_6017@ ...
> Richard Macdonald wrote:
>> wrote in message
>> news: @ ...
>>> /articles/october2007/
>>
>> One key word people forget in the 1st Amendment is "peacable"
>> excersing your free speach in a manner to disturb and disrupt others
>> activities is not peacable.
>
> So you want to silence some people because what they may say
> 'disturbs' your delicate sensibilities, or 'disrupts' your
> profound meditation.
>
> But your 'key word' is out of context...

Peacably assembling relates to associated actions not content of speach.
Lets satart at the top.

Is lighting fires and throwing rocks peacable?

Is obstructing access and traffic flow peacable?

> "...or the right of the people peaceably to assemble..."
>
> ...which leaves open the right to disturb or disrupt within
> the framework of conflicting rights.

When you actions impinge on others ability to freely act, is your action
peacable?
--
Richard A. Macdonald, CPA/EA
SSG(Ret), USA, ADA, 16P34
Gib mir Schokolade und niemand wird verletzt!!!