sci.energy

oriel36 wrote:
> 50 years later they dumped a medium on Newton anyway as 'absolute
> space' and then conveniently rejected it all over again and then you
> have 100 years of relativistic junk,some hopeless cases still think it
> is an achievement but they are the ones who jump in here and try to
> make you look like an idiot even though it may be a fair question.

They were only confused about the nature of the "ether".
Now we know that empty space is indeed not empty and
is something (as opposed to absolute nothing) that some
physicists describe as a "quantum soup" outside of which
EM waves cannot propagate.
--
73, Cecil