alt.energy.renewable

On Sep 11, 12:12 pm, Marvin wrote:
> Bill Ghrist wrote:
> > Tanhks wrote:
> >> Anthony Matonak wrote:
> >>> plenty...@ wrote:
>
> >>>> Learn about it here:http://somedamnedsapammerssite
> >>> It's not. Really.
> >>> Don't even get us started on water as fuel.
> >>> Anthony
>
> >> It is in too
> >>http://www. /
>
> >> Everyone learned the electrolysis during school.
> >> You put in two electrodes into salted water,
> >> Pass it with electric current (ac or dc)
> >> the result is water molecule separated to hydrogen and oxygen.
>
> >> This "Salt water bombarded with radio frequency energy"
> >> is just a wireless version of electrolysis process.
> >> It is flammable is the result of hydrogen and oxygen which released from
> >> this electrolysis process start burning once emerge from the surface
> >> of the water.
>
> >> I would guess the energy needed to generate the radio frequency is
> >> bigger than the energy released from the burning of hydrogen and
> >> oxygen(which released from this wireless electrolysis process).
>
> > This is not a hoax, although it suffers from somewhat misleading
> > headline writing. If you read the original newspaper article (here is a
> > more direct link: /pg/07252/ )
> > you will see that this has been demonstrated independently by a Penn
> > State chemist. Of course, as stated by the previous poster, this is a
> > (new) form of electrolysis, so it is not legitimate to call the salt
> > water itself a "fuel." The hydrogen produced by the process could be
> > called a fuel to the extent that you can call hydrogen produced by other
> > means a fuel -- it is a means of taking energy in one form (in this case
> > electromagnetic) and converting to another form (chemical).
>
> > The article also states:
>
> > "But researching its potential will take time and money, he said. One
> > immediate question is energy efficiency: The energy the RF generator
> > uses vs. the energy output from burning hydrogen."
>
> > So they are not trying to pass this off as a "free energy" proposition.
>
> Hard to see any potential, for the same reason other schemes
> like it fail. Thermodynamics rules.- Hide quoted text -

Therodynamics only rules for Carl Sagan and morons who live on
Pluto,
nobody ever claimed any different.
But, on Earth, Microprocessors, Flat Screen TV,
Lasers, GPS, Turing Machines, and Cruise Missiles rule.



>
> - Show quoted text -