sci.energy.hydrogen

On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:37:37 -0700, knews4u2chew@ wrote:

>On Sep 9, 5:33 pm, u...@ (User) wrote:
>
>>Again, it's quite funny that this magical water fuel cell designed o
>>separate "natural water" in a magical and low-energy manner, would
>>"cease to function" by reverting to conventional electrolysis when
>>sabotaged with a mysterious white powder.
>
>It's not "funny" it's YOUR LIE.
> It didn't "revert" to anything.
>Electrolysis is not what his cell performs. "No appreciable current is
>consumed."
>As was measured by expert witnesses in his lab.
>When the Plaintiff's engineer introduced "white powder" assumed to be
>electrolyte, IT CEASED TO FUNCTION. NO GAS, ZIP, NADA, ZERO.
>This means it couldn't be doing electrolysis you MORON.
>
>It ceased to produce gas.
>It stopped functionong after it had already been producing gas JUST AS
>HE DEMONSRRASTED BEFORE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE including EXPERTS FROM
>MANY COMPANIES AND COUNTRIES FOR YEARS.

It's quite funny that there's no transcript of the deposition. An act
of sabotage that would so clearly be at the heart of an unjust verdict
would be grounds for immediate dismissal. Such an act of sabotage
would at least clearly justify an appeal.

Yet Meyer never spent the few thousand dollars to have the tapes
transcribed to text so he could use them in an appeal. He always
claimed he was going to appeal, yet he never did anything toward an
appeal.

Why didn't Meyer appeal?