sci.energy.hydrogen

On Feb 22, 3:43 pm, Terryc wrote:
> knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > You must know the difference between a chemical reaction and a
> > nuclear reaction. A lot of people don't understand that but they like
> > to argue a lot in every NG on Internet.
>
> What has me puzzled is that if this works, why no one has actually built
> a working engine?
>
> That would shut everyone up.

It will.
All of Meyer's work has had to have been rediscovered, duplicated, and
improved upon by newer technology.
Meyer was ahead of his time in many ways.
Putting a cell on anything more complex than a carburated engine is no
small task. Meyer had ultimately made it into an injector/spark plug
combination.
This still requires the moification of a car's computer sensor
programs to run on the hydroxy, water tank, etc.
Right now the best is a vehicle getting 300/mpg on petrol and hydroxy.
It's legally registered with the DMV as having "hydroxy additive."
It still uses petrol for startup and cell priming.
A cross country drive is being planned.
We just got our hands on "thousands of pages" of Meyer's technical
materials.
I couldn't belive he had entrusted so much to an outside party.