sci.energy.hydrogen

On Feb 23, 5:24 am, Terryc wrote:
> knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> >>What has me puzzled is that if this works, why no one has actually built
> >>a working engine?
>
> >>That would shut everyone up.
>
> > It will.
> > All of Meyer's work has had to have been rediscovered, duplicated, and
> > improved upon by newer technology.
>
> Pllleeeaasseee, if it worked, then why hasn't anyone built a working
> engine? It is all bloody documented. Stanley Myer had it working didn't
> he? Or was he a fraud?

In this article:
/live/content/local_news/stories/2007/07/08/

The names of the investors who worked with Meyer are stated in the
article.
I spoke today to the selling Broker in Ohio of 42 acres of land which
was to be for Meyer's use to build his manufacturing and development
facility. He had purchased an option on it many years before.
It was IN FACT sold to Phillippe Vandemoortele.
Meyer had only two weeks earlier had his developement plan approved by
the county.
Why would someone who has NOTHING THAT WORKS buy 42, actually 56 acres
of land? There were actually two land parcels bought.
Why would someone spend MILLIONS patenting devices that didn't work?
Do you think for ONE MINUTE someone can "fraud" anyone into buying 56
acres of land and get millions in funding without PROVING he had
something that WORKED?
How long can he keep up any charade such as this and to what ends?
How long can he keep saying, "Almost ready?"
And to what end?
How could he ever come out ahead?
I know criminals are stupid but how can anyone do all this and not
have what he says he does?