On Feb 25, 1:34 pm, Eeyore
wrote:
> knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > Don Lancaster
>
> > > If there were any credibility whatsoever for Meyer, there would be some
> > > measurable property of water that would in some manner indicate so.
>
> > Just because they haven't discovered how to measure it doesn't mean
> > nothing exists Donny.
>
> Where's the data showing gas volume vs electrical input ? Not ONE of these idiot
> garden shed experimenters EVER posts scientific details. It's all "ooohh look. I
> made some bubbles" type crap.
>
> This is ALL that matters. Where are the NUMBERS ?
>
> Graham
Write them and ask.