sci.energy.hydrogen

knews4u2chew@ wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
> > knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > > Don Lancaster wrote:
> >
> > > > If there were any credibility whatsoever for Meyer, there would be some
> > > > measurable property of water that would in some manner indicate so.
> >
> > > Just because they haven't discovered how to measure it doesn't mean
> > > nothing exists Donny.
> >
> > Where's the data showing gas volume vs electrical input ? Not ONE of these idiot
> > garden shed experimenters EVER posts scientific details. It's all "ooohh look. I
> > made some bubbles" type crap.
> >
> > This is ALL that matters. Where are the NUMBERS ?
> >
> > Graham
>
> Write them and ask.

So you said it worked without knowing the numbers ?

Graham