sci.energy.hydrogen

On Feb 25, 2:07 pm, Eeyore
wrote:
> knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > Eeyore wrote:
> > > knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > > > Don Lancaster wrote:
>
> > > > > If there were any credibility whatsoever for Meyer, there would be some
> > > > > measurable property of water that would in some manner indicate so.
>
> > > > Just because they haven't discovered how to measure it doesn't mean
> > > > nothing exists Donny.
>
> > > Where's the data showing gas volume vs electrical input ? Not ONE of these idiot
> > > garden shed experimenters EVER posts scientific details. It's all "ooohh look. I
> > > made some bubbles" type crap.
>
> > > This is ALL that matters. Where are the NUMBERS ?
>
> > > Graham
>
> > Write them and ask.
>
> So you said it worked without knowing the numbers ?
>
> Graham

I have numbers from others.
Can't disclose their names.
They will show you soon.
Build a circuit.
Get your numbers.