sci.energy.hydrogen

knews4u2chew@ wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
> > knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > > Eeyore wrote:
> > > > knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > > > > Don Lancaster wrote:
> >
> > > > > > If there were any credibility whatsoever for Meyer, there would be some
> > > > > > measurable property of water that would in some manner indicate so.
> >
> > > > > Just because they haven't discovered how to measure it doesn't mean
> > > > > nothing exists Donny.
> >
> > > > Where's the data showing gas volume vs electrical input ? Not ONE of these idiot
> > > > garden shed experimenters EVER posts scientific details. It's all "ooohh look. I
> > > > made some bubbles" type crap.
> >
> > > > This is ALL that matters. Where are the NUMBERS ?
>
> >
> > > Write them and ask.
> >
> > So you said it worked without knowing the numbers ?
>
>
> I have numbers from others.

So let's see them. Doesn't matter if they're anonymous.


> Can't disclose their names.

Unless Big Oil kill them off ? LMFAO !


> They will show you soon.

No they won't.


> Build a circuit.
> Get your numbers.

I'm not interested in building something that (allegedly) works on mumdo-jumbo rather than
science.

Graham