Group: sci.energy.hydrogen
From: knews4u2chew@yahoo.com
Date: Monday, February 25, 2008 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: Stanley Meyers Process Experiment You Can Do

On Feb 24, 2:56 pm, Terryc wrote:
> knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > His process is called "Eletrical Polarization."
> > 4,936,961 Method for the Production of a Fuel Gas
> > "Electrical Polarization Process" (USA)
> > This is a "process patent."
> > It was reviewed inder section 101 of the PTO.
>
> > "Stan Meyer, did, in fact, under 35 USC 101 demonstrate to the PTO
> > that his technology works.
>
> > Ever read this?
>
> Which? The patent? Yes.
>
>
>
> > "Patent examiners."
>
> Who just look at a piece of paper to determine if it is NEW and
> sufficently different. Patents are about protecting IDEAS. Only
> perpetual motions machines are now required to be demonstrated in the USA.
>
> > "Seconded experts"
>
> Or in other words "consultants"
>
> >>Gullible investors are not reputable.
>
> > Dean of Engineering, Research Chemist, et al.
>
> What sort of chemistry? Did he actually know anything about nuclear
> reactions? or Electrolysis?
>
> It doesn't matter who he ran a demonstration in front of, what science
> requires is that other people can replicate the result, then science
> regards it as real.
>
> There in lies the problem; no one has replicated Meyers results. Either
> he didn't give the full information in his patent and thus made it
> worthless or it didn't work.
>
> Frankly, there isn't anything special in the specs. I could go out and
> rig it up with crap from my garage.
>
>
>
> > Meyer claims to have run a converted VW on hydrogen/oxygen
> > mixture for the last four years using a chain of six cylindrical
> > cells.
>
> did you stop and think about what you posted?

I didn't write it.
It's from an article.

> A chain implies that they operated in series,

It implies the wrong thing.

>each processing the output
> of the last one, which, if his cell works, would be unneccessary.
>
The language of the article is a bit loose.
He used 6 resonant cavities.

> Bank, . parallel maybe, but that is nothing and could be achieved by
> electrolysis now.

Parallel would be more acurate.
Do the experiment.
Make a circuit.
Restrict the amps as shown.