sci.energy.hydrogen

knews4u2chew@ wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
> > knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > > EskWI...@ wrote:
> > > > In knews4u2c...@ wrote:
> > > > > Do it.
> > > > > It's been there for you for 9 years.
> >
> > > > If it has "been there" for 9 years, why is everyone so far behind?
> >
> > > How would I know?
> > > Maybe because everyone on this group has said it''s a waste of time?
> >
> > Maybe because when the measurements are made, it's found to be a conventional
> > electrolysis provess ? As it must be.
>
> It can't be.

IT ***IS*** electrolysis !


> No heat.
> No amps.

Numbers please ! The Meyer believers NEVER ever post such data.


> No electrolyte.

ANY dissolved chemicals in water make it an electrolyte. Hence tap water IS an
electrolyte.

Was Meyer using distilled water ? NO !


Graham