Group: sci.energy
From: Bill Ward
Date: Monday, February 18, 2008 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: Tesla Turbine (again)

On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 01:52:17 -0800, your dog wrote:

>> It depends on friction rather than reactive momentum transfer, causing
>> irreversibility and unavoidable loss of efficiency. It's good for some
>> specialized applications, but not where efficiency in important.
>
> friction != inefficiency. Clutches are frictional too. All turbines have
> losses. It being good for some specialized applications was exactly what I
> figured. Do you know of any such specialized applications where you see
> them?

Running as a pump, I understand they can handle unusual liquids without
clogging. IIRC, one of the applications was pumping water containing
live fish without harming them.

Friction is in fact equal to efficiency loss, as it represents
irreversibility. You can't heat a brake and get mechanical energy out.

Again, IIRC, the max theoretical efficiency of a tesla turbine is on the
order of 60%.

There are some heated discussions in the archive
back around 1996-99. Just search for "tesla turbine".