sci.energy

On Aug 13, 6:25 pm, " ...@ " < ...@ >
wrote:
> On Aug 9, 10:27 am, BradGuth wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 9, 8:26 am, Charlie Edmondson wrote:
>
> > > BradGuth wrote:
> > > > On Aug 8, 5:47 pm, RichD wrote:
>
> > > >>On Jul 28, Eeyore wrote:
>
> > > >>>>>>This is another reason why hybrids make more sense. Pure EVs
> > > >>>>>>have too many limitations.
>
> > > >>>>>If they could recharge in 10 mins, the US power grid would burn out
>
> > > >>>>What about these?
> > > >>>> /
>
> > > >>>Shockingly expensive. $75,000 per vehicle just for batteries.
> > > >>> /2006/07/
>
> > > >>Expensive, who cares? We're talking about the
> > > >>ENVIRONMENT, we can't worry about filty lucre.
> > > >>What are you, a greedy Republican?
>
> > > >>Let the gov't fund it, won't cost a farthing! That's
> > > >>why we need visionaries like Al Gore, bold men
> > > >>not afraid to take on the special interests, leading
> > > >>by example.
>
> > > >>--
> > > >>Rich
>
> > > > How much cheap h2o2 would you like for your electric cars?
>
> > > > How about a Hummwe/SUV at zeroNOxand 100 empg?
> > > > - Brad Guth
>
> > > Brad,
> > > Just go away now. This ain't SEH where you have a couple of logical
> > > engineers around, this is SED where the REAL engineers will tear you a
> > > new one!
>
> > > Charlie
>
> > Why are you Yiddish folks so deathly afraid of allowing any surplus of
> > the 100% renewable energy, as for such clean energy going into the
> > productions of LH2 and h2o2?
>
> > Why are you against a Hummer/SUV that gets 100 empg and creates zero
> >NOx?
> > - Brad Guth
>
> As someone who understands what it might take to get a Hummer or SUV
> to 100 empg and zeroNOx, I want a Hummer/SUV that can seat at least
> one person, accelerate from zero to sixty mph in less than thirty
> seconds, and not crumple if I inadvertantly lean against it.
>
> There are only two ways to produce useful amounts of LH2 and H2O2,
> economically-- new coal generation and new nuclear generation. While
> I personally want the latter, thanks to wrongheaded environmentalists,
> the former is more likely.

You're absolutely joking, right! I to guess you're not being from
Earth imposes a great number of limitations on the scope of your
intelligence. What silly planet of such all-knowing naysayism did you
say you were from?
- Brad Guth