sci.energy

On Aug 31, 7:23 pm, Eeyore
wrote:
> Your mistake is to assume the 'Brad Gruth' gives a damn about any of the above
> or even remotely vares about the science. He doesn't. I (along with many others)
> have tried to understand his ideas and explain his errors but quite simply he
> doesn't care. He is wedded to his stupid h2o2 ideas (and the 1000hp Hummer) come
> rain or shine.
>
> Graham

In other words, you and others of your naysay kind don't believe in
the regular laws of physics or in the best available science. We
understand, perfectly.
- Brad Guth