sci.energy

Sevenhundred Elves wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Sevenhundred Elves wrote:
> >
> > > Eeyore wrote:
> > > > BradGuth wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Up to 1000 shp of hybrid energy under that Hummer hood should do a
> > > > > little better than 15 mph.
> > > >
> > > > You're a Grade-A IDIOT !
> > >
> > > Please, such comments are of no use at all.
> >
> > They're as much use as any other response where 'Brad Gruth' is concerned.
> >
> >
> > > Instead, what Brad needs to understand is that there are some major
> > > flaws in his plan to make H2O2 in the vehicle while it is on the road.
> > >
> > > The flaw that's easiest to point out is this:
> > >
> > > It takes energy to convert water to H2O2, and this energy would have to
> > > be brought along in the car somehow. But if you already have a way of
> > > bringing the energy along, it is an unnecessary complication to use it
> > > to convert water to H2O2 and then use that H2O2 to fuel the car. It
> > > would be easier and more energy-efficient to use that stored energy to
> > > fuel the car directly.
> >
> > Your mistake is to assume the 'Brad Gruth' gives a damn about any of the above
> > or even remotely cares about the science. He doesn't. I (along with many others)
> > have tried to understand his ideas and explain his errors but quite simply he
> > doesn't care. He is wedded to his stupid h2o2 ideas (and the 1000hp Hummer) come
> > rain or shine.
>
> I can, of course, only hope that he cares to ponder what I said above.
>
> Brad, did you read it, and did you find it has any bearing on your
> ideas?

See his responses.

He believes science means you can get 'free' h202.

Graham