sci.energy

BradGuth wrote:

> On Aug 31, 6:43 pm, Sevenhundred Elves
> wrote:
> > Eeyore wrote:
> >
> > >BradGuthwrote:
> >
> > > > Up to 1000 shp of hybrid energy under that Hummer hood should do a
> > > > little better than 15 mph.
> >
> > > You're a Grade-A IDIOT !
> >
> > Please, such comments are of no use at all.
> >
> > Instead, what Brad needs to understand is that there are some major
> > flaws in his plan to make H2O2 in the vehicle while it is on the road.
>
> ??? "on the road" ??? (are you nuts?)

No. Frankly, I thought YOU were. Some of the things you have said in
this forum... Well, let's just say they don't fall within the scope of
polite debate.

But if you don't intend to make the H2O2 while you drive, why would you
find it necessary to have a chemical plant in your car? Let the gas
stations sell it instead. Makes for a lighter car.

> >
> > The flaw that's easiest to point out is this:
> >
> > It takes energy to convert water to H2O2, and this energy would have to
> > be brought along in the car somehow. But if you already have a way of
> > bringing the energy along, it is an unnecessary complication to use it
> > to convert water to H2O2 and then use that H2O2 to fuel the car. It
> > would be easier and more energy-efficient to use that stored energy to
> > fuel the car directly.
> >
> > S.
>
> My goodness, naysayism is taken to a new and improved level, of your
> being dumb and dumber (aka dumbfounded) way past the point of no
> possible return. Even your out-of-context is out of context. Good
> grief, are you not from Earth?
> - Brad Guth

Please, tell me again what problems you aim to solve with your proposed
use of H2O2. I believe one valid point of it is to reduce the amount of
nitrous compounds in the exhaust. What else do you have?

S.