alt.energy.renewable

On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:52:25 -0000, bealiba@ wrote:

>On Aug 2, 1:11 am, wmbjkREM...@ wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:09:31 -0000, beal...@ wrote:
>> >On Aug 1, 1:49 am, wmbjkREM...@ wrote:

>> >> Who do you expect to believe that your only AC load is a computer?
>>
>> >No there is a printer as well.
>>
>> LOL The more you write, the more readers will realize how much you do
>> without. Do you even have any AC outlets in this "work of art" house?
>> Or do you plug the computer into the inverter or an extension cord as
>> someone on a camping trip might?
>
>You might. My house is wired 240 and 12

I guess you're not going to say if you have any AC outlets, which I
take as a "no".

>> >Yes I have a washing machine. No it is not run from the solar power
>> >system.
>>
>> No kidding? Why do your "audits" frequently mention irrelevant details
>> like chainsaw and motorcycle fuel consumption, but neglect to include
>> normal household appliances, and the generator time and fuel it takes
>> to power them?
>
>One audit contains all my energy use for all sources and uses
>(Vehicles, tractor, workshop anPV system) the other audit is the PV
>system only.

Sure, and either audit contains different numbers each time you post
it. One day it's 20 liters per week, the next it's 20 liters per ISO
fortnight. One day a load is 59W, the next it's 150W. One day you have
a cake mixer , the next it becomes invisible. But some things
always stay the same - nobody believes you're honest or competent.

>> >My system does not sit on float for days on end. It is either being
>> >charged or discharged during normal daily use.
>>
>> You claimed that your batteries are fully charged most days before
>> noon. If that were true (not that I believe it for a second), then
>> you're "floating" (more like equalizing) your batteries for hours each
>> day. I expect you're actually running short most days, that you've set
>> the voltage high to avoid losing energy when the controller would
>> normally be regulating during absorption, and that the high float
>> setting therefore doesn't hurt much except to reveal your helplessness
>> on Usenet.
>
>You really are an idiot aren't you. Yes I have set the charge higher a
>whole .5 of a volt. Highly experimental and dangerous stuff. Don't try
>this at home children.

No, your battery maker clearly recommends a float voltage between
and (pg 10)
/downloads/ %20Suncycle%20Operation%20and%20Maintenance%
15- =.5 .... on Planet Nitwit.

>Lifestyle choice is just that "Choice"

Agreed, and you've clearly chosen to be an ignorant prevaricator.

Wayne