sci.energy.hydrogen

Eeyore wrote:
>
> Don Lancaster wrote:
>
>> Eeyore wrote:
>>> knews4u2chew@ wrote:
>>>
>>>> /acrobat/
>>>
>>> " Non-Faradic generation of hydrogen gas is sometimes 80 times higher than the gas from normal electrolysis. Excess > hydrogen has proved difficult to replicate by other laboratories, although we are able to reproduce it regularly. "
>>> I wonder why that is.
>>
>> Mostly because the gas is really steam.
>>
>> /glib/ for a detailed analysis.
>
> Actually, I took a look at one of those 'experiments' on youtube.
>
> The promoters of the idea claim that 'pulsing' the current at high frequency is the key. In the youtube clip, the 'experimenter' was using a cheap clamp type DMM to measure the current.
>
> What do you reckon the chances are that the frequency in use was well beyond the -3dB point of the meter's AC frequency response ?
>
> Graham
>

And since the vibration frequency of the water molecule is in the
infra-red, tell me how some electronic circuit is capable of produceing
such a frequency in the interest of breaking the bonds in water? The
idiot, JW, actually believes that lower frequency vibrations can be
stored up and eventually enough energy will be delivered to the bond to
break it. He thinks the other idiots have managed to violate the
principle that the bond can only absoorb energy of the vibration
frequency of the bond. In other words, "to hell with the laws of quantum
mechanics, my mind is made up" summarizes JW's understanding of the laws
of nature.
FK