sci.energy.hydrogen

On Jul 27, 9:56 am, " . Allen" wrote:
> BradGuth wrote:
> > On Jul 26, 6:14 pm, "Morris Dovey" wrote:
> >> BradGuth wrote:
>
> >> | You want little old me to republish the matter of facts as they
> >> | already exist? For Christ's sake, don't trust me, trust the
> >> | published regular laws of physics along with the new and old and
> >> | replicated science that has existed for decades.
>
> >> I was looking for evidence that you had something to contribute.
>
> > Oddly, I was the one looking for others to contribute something
> > constructive.
>
> > We need look no further than the WWW or into your nearest old physics
> > and science books on h2o2, that is if you want the real down to Earth
> > story.
>
> I think what he's trying to say is that you have not yet made a
> compelling enough case that many of us think it worthwhile to spend any
> of our own time or energy on it. In other words, if you want people to
> be excited about this, the onus is on *you* to make them excited.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Fair enough. I'll be back.
- Brad Guth