sci.energy.hydrogen

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:56:58 -0400, . Allen wrote:

> BradGuth wrote:
>> On Jul 26, 6:14 pm, "Morris Dovey" wrote:
>>> BradGuth wrote:
>>>
>>> | You want little old me to republish the matter of facts as they
>>> | already exist? For Christ's sake, don't trust me, trust the
>>> | published regular laws of physics along with the new and old and
>>> | replicated science that has existed for decades.
>>>
>>> I was looking for evidence that you had something to contribute.
>>
>> Oddly, I was the one looking for others to contribute something
>> constructive.
>>
>> We need look no further than the WWW or into your nearest old physics
>> and science books on h2o2, that is if you want the real down to Earth
>> story.
>
> I think what he's trying to say is that you have not yet made a compelling
> enough case that many of us think it worthwhile to spend any of our own
> time or energy on it. In other words, if you want people to be excited
> about this, the onus is on *you* to make them excited.

Maybe he could start with the bombardier beetle. It has on-board H2O2
production and storage. And the use is precisely on topic.

/wiki/Bombardier_beetle