sci.energy.hydrogen

BradGuth wrote:

| In this Usenet anti-think-tank land of mostly mainstream naysayism
| (especially applied if you're not sufficiently Jewish) has been
| obvious since the first time I'd posted anything related to my
| research, as well as having been obvious as to how others like
| yourself were being stalked, bashed and often banished (aka
| moderated to death) whenever possible.

I think you've missed something essential: The
stalkers/spammers/trolls/(whatever) make _themselves_ irrelevant and
not to be taken seriously. Why should you allow yourself to be drained
of anything worthwhile by such?

If your research is well founded, carefully executed, and well-enough
documented that others can duplicate and confirm your findings, what
can one (or a million) naysayers possibly subtract?

Excelsior!

| Clearly of anything that takes a cent of our energy loot away from
| the likes of ENRON or Exxon becomes a fair enough target to snuff
| out, instead of their haveng been constructively contributing or
| otherwise promoting as to the honest what-if potential.

Even if I were prepared to agree that this was true (which I'm not),
there is at least one safe path: distribute the knowledge so widely
that nothing done to you or those with whom you work could effect
supression of that knowledge. If the knowledge clearly can't be
supressed, then it becomes counter-productive to "snuff" the origin.

IMO, this may be one of the _most_ important contributions of the
Internet and nntp.

Damn the torpedos - full speed ahead!

--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
/DeSoto/