alt.energy.renewable

"Eeyore" wrote in message
news: @ ...
>
>
> Reader wrote:
>
>> >
>> > A wind turbine doesn't *need* to be atop a mountain after all.
>> >
>> > Graham
>>
>> To put one here in the draw we're talking of a tower hundreds of feet
>> high--also not realistic, I understand. I could get away with one maybe
>> only
>> 100 feet tall about 800 feet from the house, but that brings in the same
>> distance issues as the totally open mountaintop 1700 feet away.
>
> It would seem you're between the proverbial rock and a hard place !

Scylla and Charybdis indeed! Why don't you just =move= up to the mtn
top? ;-)
>
> Graham
>
>