sci.energy.hydrogen

wrote in message
news: @ ...
> On Sep 24, 6:58 pm, "Paul Maffia" wrote:

> > Those weren't my comments, but yes I've read the interviews with 'real,
>> > live structural engineers' and am satisfied that their explanations fit
>> > the facts.
>>
>> But don't you realize that since their explanation shows just how idiotic
>> knews4u's explanation, he just won't accept them as knowing anything?
>
> /node/10025
>
> Architects for 911 truth.
> 168 professionals know 911 was a controlled demolition.
>

'professional' what? Conspiracy theorists? I understand that books with
sensational dust jackets sell, and the talk circuit pays for sensationalism.
But professional engineers and scientists that have actually been to ground
zero or put their hands on some of the material? No, I don't think so.

Then of course there is the pseudo-professional we've all heard of. You
know the type, has a doctorate in studying mud-skippers and suddenly they
are experts in metalurgy. Or they've taught first-year chemistry for ten
years so suddenly they can identify thermite from video taken thousands of
feet away. Nah, they just want to 'get published' so they can try for
tenure.

daestrom